1. The decision made by the Intellectual Property Tribunal on October 31, 2018 by the Intellectual Property Tribunal on the case shall be revoked.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

1. Basic facts

A. The name of the invention claimed in this case (Evidence 2) 1: B) filing date/application number: Plaintiff 4 (amended by April 25, 2017) (hereinafter referred to as “entent 1”); body of the Plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as “contests”) equipped with an internal space that flows into part of the combustion stored in the transformer 1) ; a separate installation that forms part of the inner space of the body above (hereinafter referred to as “contests 2”); hereinafter referred to as “contests 2”; hereinafter referred to as “contests 3”); and hereinafter referred to as “contests 3”; and hereinafter the aforementioned separate installation is equipped with a license that can measure heavy gas separated by the separation string, and the separate installation of the body of the Plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as “contests 4 and excluding the foregoing”) appears to be separated from the body of the body of the Plaintiff, but the separate installation and exclusion from the body of the Plaintiff appears to be separate from the body of the Plaintiff.

(hereinafter referred to as “class 6”). The above separation is divided into an explosive and gas cluster space (hereinafter referred to as “class 7”) and the above separation is made in the form of a rectangular body or spacked core (hereinafter referred to as “class 8”) so that at least two parallels can be placed at least in the oil cluster space leading to the gas cluster space (hereinafter referred to as “class 7”), and the said separation is set up in the form of a rectangular body or spacked core (hereinafter referred to as “class 8”), and the said separation is set up at the bottom of the gas cluster and the said separation is formed in the part leading to the gas cluster space (hereinafter referred to as “class 9”).