1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. Determination on the legitimacy of a subsequent appeal

A. As a matter of principle, service by delivery of documents to the person to be served on the person in question at his domicile, residence, business office or office of the person to be served (Articles 178(1) and 183(1) of the Civil Procedure Act), or by supplementary service, if the service agency fails to retain the person to receive the service at the above place, such service may be made by supplementary service, as his/her clerk, employee, or cohabitant, which is delivered to the person with intelligence to make reasonable judgment.

(Article 186(1)(b) of the same Act.

In this case, on April 19, 2017, the court of first instance sent a copy of the complaint, etc. of this case to Ulsan-gun G apartment, Ulsan-gun, and 103 (hereinafter “the domicile of this case”) which is the defendant’s domicile entered in the complaint, and on April 25, 2017, H received it as the defendant’s “Dong-gun”. ② The court of first instance issued a notice of sentencing to the defendant on August 16, 2017 upon the defendant’s failure to submit a written response; ③ the court of first instance was not served on the defendant on August 22, 2017 due to the absence of closure; ③ the court of first instance sent the notice of sentencing to the defendant on August 22, 2017 to the court of first instance on August 25, 2017; and ④ the defendant sent the notice of winning the judgment of the court of first instance to the court of first instance on 2017 square meters on August 10, 2017.

C. However, in full view of the purport of the entire arguments in the records of this case, since the transfer of the Defendant to “Yansanbuk-gu I apartment and 705 Dong 2003, 2015” on November 20, 2015, the instant case has been pending.