beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Power] On January 20, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and eight months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Ulsan District Court on February 17, 2018, and completed the execution of the sentence in the port prison.
【Criminal Facts】
"2019 Highest 1528"
1. Fraud;
A. On February 3, 2019, at around 00:00, the Defendant: (a) had the “D” of the victim C’s operation on the Ulsan-gun B and the second floor of Ulsan-gun; (b) had the intent and ability to pay the amount despite the receipt of alcoholic beverages from the victim; (c) had the victim had the intent and ability to pay the amount; (d) had the victim paid the amount of food normally; and (e) had the victim received six soldiers from the victim.
B. On February 16, 2019, the Defendant was above the Defendant around 01:05.
In fact at the place of port entry, the victim had no intent and ability to pay the amount of food and drink even if the victim received it from the victim, and the victim had been accused of being paid the amount of food and beverage normally, and the victim was delivered three diseases equivalent to 18,000 won from the victim.
C. Around 03:00 on February 16, 2019, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim F’s “Gsinging room” in Ulsan-gun E, Ulsan-gun, despite the victim’s intent and ability to pay the price even if he/she received an alcoholic beverage and an alcoholic beverage; (b) by deceiving the victim to normally pay the price to the victim; (c) the Defendant received an alcoholic beverage and an alcoholic beverage equivalent to KRW 120,000 from the victim; and (d) the Defendant used the entertainment entertainment service and did not pay KRW 50,000,000 for the service cost.
The Defendant, at around 03:40 on March 6, 2019, under the “J” of the Victim I operated in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, U.S., U.S., under which the Defendant was aware that the Defendant would normally pay the amount of food to the victim despite the victim’s intention and ability to pay the amount even if the Defendant received alcohol and the alcohol from the victim, and that the Defendant was aware that the Defendant would normally pay the amount of food to the victim, and that the Defendant received the payment of the amount of food to the victim.