A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 9, 2016, from around 17:30 on March 9, 2016 to 18:03 on the same day, the Defendant who interfered with his/her business is a knife with the net country and the small-scale 2 soldiers in the “E restaurant” operated by the Cvictim D, with the order of 18:03 on the same day.

"A male guest who has taken meals on the side table" means that a male guest is able to take a bath, sound a restaurant, and the victim booms the other customer, and the victim is able to sound the other customer.

하자 피해자를 노려보며 ‘ 문을 부숴 버리겠다’ 고 소리를 지르는 등 위력을 행사하여 피해자의 정당한 식당 영업 업무를 방해하였다.

2. On March 9, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, who was reported by D 112 at the places indicated in paragraph (1) around 18:15 on March 18:15, 201 and was called out, refers to the following police officers: G of the Police Station of the Modern Western Book, who were assigned to the police box of the Modern Western Book, and who were about to take the Defendant out of the restaurant to return home to the restaurant in order to prevent the Defendant from running the restaurant business.

One time to walk the h's clothes of the h, which is called "the sound," and the h's clothes of the h have been driven by the string.

As a result, the Defendant assaulted H who is a police officer in charge of duties related to suppression, prevention and investigation of crimes and obstructed his/her legitimate execution of official duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. Application of the respective laws and regulations of D, I and J

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties) and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel regarding the assertion of mental and physical weakness under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for the observation of protection and observation, are suffering from mental disorder and alcohol addiction, and the defendant was in a state of mental and physical weakness by drinking, even at the time of each of the crimes in this case.