A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

No one shall provide any means of access used to make a transaction request in electronic financial transactions or to secure the authenticity and accuracy of users and the details of such transaction with or promise to provide or receive any consideration therefor.

Nevertheless, on April 26, 2019, the Defendant would pay KRW 2,40,000 per one sheet if he/she lent a advertising message stating that “I need to contact status .. short-term money is prepared. 2,400,000 won per progress case and 4,80,000 won per two cases.”

“The proposal received and accepted it, and at around 14:00 on the 29th day of the same month, the Cranc City Office located in Cranc City B sent one physical card connected to the D Bank account under the name of the Defendant to the person under whose name the card was not entered.

Accordingly, the Defendant promised to lend the means of access for electronic financial transactions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The document and written statement of the F;

1. Responses to requests for the provision of receipts or financial information, and the application of text messages to Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 49(4)2 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act and Articles 6(3)2 and 6(3)2 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Although the defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act was subject to a disposition of suspension of indictment due to the same act, the defendant is deemed to have committed the crime of this case even though he was subject to a disposition of suspension of indictment due to the same act, it is recognized that he committed the crime of this case, but the defendant repents and reflects the mistake, and the defendant seems not to have taken profits from the crime of this case