Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants’ joint criminal acts introduced, around October 20, 2016, the victim F office located in Songpa-gu Seoul E building, as Defendant A’s church pastor and Defendant B’s church warden, respectively, and sought to take over plastic production factories to the victim.

If a person lends KRW 30 million to another person, he/she shall take over a factory and receive a loan of KRW 2 billion, and shall pay the above KRW 30 million until November 20, 2016.

In addition, a false statement was made that 300 million won out of the above loans will be lent as interest free of charge for six months so that it can be helpful for the missionary work of the party.

However, the Defendants did not intend to take over the plastic production plant as above, and even if they borrowed the above money from the injured party, they did not have the intent or ability to pay it.

The Defendants deceptioned the victims as such, and received from the victims, the amount of KRW 30 million from the national bank account in the name of the “G church,” which is the Defendant A’s account.

As a result, the defendants conspired to acquire the property of the victim.

2. Defendant B, at the same place as before and after November 3, 2016, at the same time as in the preceding paragraph, would be paid KRW 20 million to the victim with the amount of KRW 25 million from the loan of KRW 20 million to the above money, and the vehicle will be sold again, and the amount of KRW 25 million will be paid to the victim with the contribution of the missionary work.

“A false representation was made.”

However, even if the Defendant borrowed the above money from the injured party, it was thought that it will be used as the land sale price, and it was not thought to be used as the automobile sale price, and there was no intention or ability to repay the above borrowed money due to the debt amounting to KRW 120 million at the time.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 20 million won from the damaged person to the Defendant’s name cooperation account.

Summary of Evidence

[Defendant A]

1. The defendant A-.