logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.10.20 2016나12420
임금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

In fact, the defendant awarded a contract for a new construction of multi-family housing with G to the co-defendant F of the first instance court (hereinafter referred to as the "F") who did not register the construction business due to a contract with G for a new construction of housing and apartment buildings.

F performed the aforesaid molding construction from March 15, 2016 to July 1, 2016, and the Plaintiffs provided labor at the site of the relevant molding construction.

Unpaid wages, etc. for the plaintiffs are as follows:

Plaintiff

According to Article 1 A 6,900,000 2016-06-21 2016-2016 2,700, 2000 2,706 22,706-22,700 2016-05-27 2016-11 2016-06-13 C 33,5,760,000 2016-6-00 2016-24, 2016-24, 2016-07-114, 207-16-14, 200, 2016-2, 206-16-2, 207-14, the Defendant shall be jointly and severally liable for damages for delay due to the retirement of unpaid wages to workers under Article 2 of the Framework Act on the Construction Industry (where any construction business is 6016-5, 2016-206-6-16-20 of the Labor Standards.

Pursuant to F and F, the amount stated in the “Unpaid Wage” column in paragraph (1)(c) and the amount so paid to the Plaintiffs, 14 days after the date of each retirement of the Plaintiffs, or thereafter, the Plaintiff B and C are obligated to pay damages for delay calculated at the rate of 20% per annum as stipulated in the Labor Standards Act and the Enforcement Decree of the same Act from each date to the date of full payment, as claimed by the Plaintiff B and C.

The conclusion is.

arrow