The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the reasons for appeal (a prison term of one year and six months, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of all the conditions of sentencing and the scope of recommended sentences according to the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court sentencing committee, including favorable circumstances, including the defendant’s age character and character environment, motive means of crime, circumstances after crime, etc., including unfavorable circumstances, and the scope of recommended sentences according to the argument and records of this case and the records, the lower court’s sentence that the defendant was sentenced is too unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. However, pursuant to Article 25(1) of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure, “one gambling tape” in Article 10 of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure No. 25(1) shall be ex officio as “one gambling tape (No. 4),” and “excess (13cm in total, 23cm, 13cm in length, 13cm in length, 13cm in number)” in Article 25(1) of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure shall be deemed as “one gambling tape” in Article 10 through 11 of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure, and “propary tape” in Article 3 of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure No. 11 of the Decision No. 2 as “No. 3000, 300 and 111 of the Decision.”