logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.05.14 2014고단839
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동공갈)등
Text

Defendants are innocent.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On December 1, 2006, the Defendants’ co-principaled with the phrase, “If the Defendants purchased shares of KRW 60 million in the amount of KRW 120 million in the purchase of KRW 240,000,000,000,000,000,000 from the victim E (the age of 64) who was a relative of the Plaintiff (hereinafter “F”) at the time of 120,000,000 won, the Defendants were to purchase the shares of the said forest with KRW 120,000,000,000,000 won for KRW 60,000,000, and the victims did not grant the profits of KRW 60,000,000 in the said forestry map and did not look at the victim’s house and hospital to recover the principal and the profits of the victim.

(1) While the Defendants repeatedly found the victim’s residence and place of work from around December 2007 to March 201, and expressed the victim’s desire and threatened the victim, the Defendants conspired to gain profits by being provided the said victim’s share of three lots of forest land F outside Gyeonggicheon-gun, which was purchased by the victim.

Accordingly, at around 14:00 on August 13, 2010, Defendant A submitted a written statement prepared in advance by Defendant B to the victim from the 6th floor emergency stairs of H Hospital located in Jung-gu, Jung-gu, Jung-gu, and had the victim sign a written statement stating that “If the principal is not 120,000,000 won and the profits are not known, N will transfer the shares of the victim’s forest purchased, N will transfer the shares of the victim’s forest purchased to the Defendants without compensation.”

As such, the Defendants made the victim prepare a letter to the effect that the victim will be provided free of charge by threatening the victim.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to threaten the victim to prepare a written statement.

(2) Defendants in violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint conflict) were provided with a letter from the victim as described in the above (1), but they were provided with such letter.

arrow