beta
Text
1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
Reasons
1. The plaintiffs asserted that on April 2, 2007, E loaned KRW 30 million to the defendant at an annual interest rate of 6%, and the defendant did not pay KRW 14,250,000 (the total interest amount of KRW 18,000,000 from April 2, 2007 to April 1, 2017) for principal and interest amount of KRW 3,750,000,000,000 (the total interest amount of KRW 18,00,000,000 and KRW 3,750,00,000,000) to the heir. As E died on April 17, 2015, the defendant asserts that he has a duty to pay each of the above claims amount corresponding to his shares of inheritance to the heir.
2. On April 2, 2007, E remitted 30 million won to the deposit account in the name of the Defendant on May 1, 2007, including deposit in the name of F on May 1, 2007 through July 4, 2008, to the effect that “A” evidence Nos. 150,000 won each was 150,000 won in each of the 15,000 won in the name of the Defendant, F and G from August 28, 2008 to December 31, 2014, and the facts that the deceased’s children were 30,000 won each over five times in the name of G from August 28, 2008 to December 31, 2014, and the deceased’s children were 1.5 million won each, and the deceased’s children were 2015 and 300,000 won each of the deceased’s children (the deceased’s children).
However, in light of the following circumstances, the above facts alone are insufficient to acknowledge the fact that the deceased lent KRW 30 million to the defendant, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. In light of the following circumstances, the evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, 5, 8, part of the evidence No. 8, and Ha’s witness H’s testimony, the above facts of recognition alone are insufficient to acknowledge the fact that the deceased lent KRW 30 million to the defendant.
① The Defendant asserts that a person who borrowed KRW 30 million from the Deceased was F in the Defendant’s wife, and that F used the Defendant’s deposit account or G’s deposit account in the name of the Defendant in relation to the operation of a ginseng wholesale and retail business, and that each entry of F’s business closure certificate and F’s certification is consistent therewith.
On the other hand, the deceased and the deceased.