The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is around 13:51 on March 17, 2014, the Defendant: (a) listened to the fact that the victim B, who was a part of society, was fluencing, was fluencing at the place of hullar; (b) was flucing the victim, but did not receive the phone; (c) on the victim’s cell phone voice message, the Defendant was flucing the victim’s cell phone message, and was flucing it to the prosecutor; and (d) the Defendant was flucing the Defendant’s body, etc., of the victim’s cell phone voice message, and was flucing it. The Defendant also found that the Defendant sent the victim’s voice message, such as the victim’s flucencing in the face of hulb in this subparagraph, and did not receive the phone; and (d) was flucencing the victim’s body.

2. The above facts charged are the crimes falling under Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 283(3) of the Criminal Act.

According to the records, the victim B may recognize the fact that he/she has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant on March 20, 2015, which was after the prosecution of this case was instituted. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.