Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On September 26, 2014, after the expiration of the period of stay ( October 26, 2014), the Plaintiff, a foreigner of the nationality of the Republic of Egypt (hereinafter referred to as “ Egypt”) entered the Republic of Korea for tourism and Tong (B-2) sojourn and stayed in the Republic of Korea on September 26, 2014, filed an application for refugee status with the Defendant on July 10, 2015.
B. On September 10, 2015, the Defendant rendered a decision to deny refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff does not constitute a case where there is a well-founded fear that the Plaintiff would be subject to persecution” as prescribed by Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.
[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff was arrested in Egypt to the police, and that it was threatened by the slick-type group on the slick-type group.
The slick-type group died of the Plaintiff’s mother and her punishment, and attempted to kill the Plaintiff.
Therefore, the Plaintiff constitutes a refugee.
Nevertheless, the instant disposition made by the Defendant on a different premise is unlawful.
(b) The definitions of terms used in this Act shall be as follows:
1. The term "refugee" means a foreigner who is unable or does not want to be protected from the country of his/her nationality due to well-founded fear that he/she may be injured on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, status as a member of a specific social group, or political opinion, or a stateless foreigner who, owing to such fear, is unable or does not want to return to the country in which he/she resided before entering the Republic of Korea (hereinafter referred to as "state of his/her nationality");
C. Determination 1 is recognized by comprehensively taking account of the respective descriptions of Nos. 1 to 4 and the purport of the entire pleadings.