logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.04.20 2017고정2896
수입식품안전관리특별법위반
Text

Defendant

A and B shall be punished by a fine of 4,000,000 won, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of 6,000,000 won.

Defendant

A. A.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A and Defendant B operated Defendant C Co., Ltd. as a chain of sales of imported food, etc. in Incheon Jung-gu D 301, and Defendant A was in charge of import duties, and Defendant B was in charge of domestic sales duties.

1. On April 28, 2016, the Defendant imported 19,000 kilograms (unit price 57,461,034 won, kg, 3,024 won) from the Cheongdo Regional Fishery Product Processing Factory “E” and “F Company” of China’s Cheongdo, and filed a false import declaration with the Minister of Food and Drug Safety, while importing 19,000 kilograms (unit price 57,461,034 won, kg, 3,024 won) of the above c, which is classified as food additives, after being used and processed, stating that he/she should file an import declaration with the Minister of Food and Drug Safety as processed food as processed food, with the knowledge of the fact that he/she should file an import declaration with the Minister as processed food, etc., from that time to June 20, 2016, by marking 34,500 kilograms (unit price 10,613,177 won).

2. On November 18, 2015, in order to distribute in the case of freezing calcs, which are classified as food additives and imported after being used and processed, Defendant B sold calcs equivalent to 66,50cc (305,040,000 won) of freezing calcs over 94 times in total from June 20, 2016, from that time to June 20, 2016, with knowledge of the fact that the name, brief name, etc. of food additives used in the processing, as well as in the distribution period of products, was indicated in the matters indicated in Korean language, and without such indication, sold in violation of food labelling standards.

3. Defendant C

A. On the date specified in paragraph 1, the Defendant violated the Special Act on Imported Food Safety Control (hereinafter “Defendant”) filed a false import declaration with respect to the Defendant’s business.

B. At the time stated in paragraph (2), the Defendant violated the Food Sanitation Act, as provided in paragraph (2), that Party B, who operates the Defendant Company, operates the Defendant Company, with respect to the Defendant’s business.

arrow