A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

In 2013, the Defendant worked at a branch of Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si), and was in charge of loan-related affairs. The victim E is a customer who uses the above Kimpo-si, and the Defendant and the victim were well aware of it.

On January 29, 2013, the defendant borrowed money to the victim as collateral at the time of receiving the existing loan, which is more than KRW 100,000,00,000 to pay interest instead of interest, and the principal will be repaid after one year.

“Falsely false.”

However, in fact, even if the defendant, at the time, bears a debt equivalent to about KRW 1.9 billion and borrowed money from the injured party who has paid the interest of KRW 10 million or more per month, he did not have the intention or ability to pay the principal after one year.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received a loan of KRW 100 million from the victim on the same day and got the victim to remit KRW 70 million to the national bank account in the name of F, the creditor of the Defendant, and KRW 30 million to the G bank account in the name of G, the mother of F.

Accordingly, the defendant was delivered KRW 100 million by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. A protocol of examination of the suspect against the accused by the prosecution (including the cross-examination);

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Determination as to the assertion by a complaint, a loan certificate, a certificate of entire registered matters, a deposit without passbook, an additional agreement on transaction, a certificate of payment of interest on marina loan, a deposit transaction document, a statement of deposit transaction, each debt-proof source, a copy of the credit ledger, an inquiry about the sales contract on the housing site of migrants, a sales contract on the housing site of migrants

1. The gist of the assertion is that the Defendant received KRW 100 million from the injured party on January 29, 2013, but this is in the course of constructing a factory on the land of Kimpo-si, H and I at that time.