logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2020.01.22 2019고단3942
전자금융거래법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On June 12, 2019, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for a crime of fraud and a crime of violating the Electronic Financial Transactions Act at the Seoul Western District Court on January 21, 2019 and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 21, 2019.

【Criminal Execution Office】

1. On February 19, 2019, the Defendant’s Cze Card (C) lending was required to pay money after leaving the bank around January 31, 2019, and the Defendant accepted the Defendant’s offer that “The name account needs to be used for the purpose of tax reduction and exemption, if the Defendant lent the available account and the check card, and two million won will be given to the Defendant.”

Since then, around February 19, 2019, the Defendant sent a physical card (C) No. 1 and passwords connected to the Defendant’s name Bbank account (F), and a mail tag with the account number attached to the door-to-door box, and sent it to the Kwikset service engineer in name.

Accordingly, the Defendant promised to receive compensation as above and lent one of the means of access in the name of the Defendant.

2. On February 26, 2019, the Defendant: (a) after committing the crime as set forth in paragraph (1) of the foregoing paragraph; (b) during the search of the “large-Scale Alb Card” through the re-building D, the Defendant reported the advertisement of the transfer of the re-building card; and (c) contacted the name in the name of another living site; and (d) received a proposal from the Defendant that “on the face of lending the account number and the check card for the purpose of tax reduction and exemption, 10-2 million won per day, as the borrowed account is necessary for the exchange of gambling funds,” and then, on February 26, 2019, the Defendant sent the check card (G) connected to the said B bank account under the name of the Defendant to the baggage check from Daejeon Terminal to the Defendant’s account; and (b) notified the account number and password to E.

Accordingly, the Defendant promised the above consideration and lent one of the means of access in the name of the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;

arrow