1. All plaintiffs' lawsuits are dismissed.

2. As to the land listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4.

1. In the absence of dispute between the parties to the judgment prior to the merits, or in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings as to Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the plaintiffs can recognize the fact that the plaintiffs completed the registration of transfer of ownership to the acquiring intervenor prior to the closing of argument in the instant case.

According to the above facts of recognition, the plaintiffs cannot be deemed as co-owners of the land listed in the attached Table 1 list (hereinafter referred to as the "land of this case"). Thus, all of the plaintiffs' lawsuits are dismissed as illegal and unlawful.

2. Judgment on the merits

A. The land of this case was owned by the Plaintiffs, AA, AB, AC, AD, and AE respectively. However, the changes and status of co-ownership of the land of this case until the closure of the pleadings of this case are as follows. The co-ownership of the land of this case was changed and the co-owners did not reach an agreement on the method of partition of land among the co-owners.

. The heir of the defendant A [the heir of the defendant A] [the heir of the defendant A] who owns 2/7 shares in the aggregate 1/7 shares in March 10, 2015] 3/7 shares in the Government - - - - 7 shares in the Government - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 shares in the deceased A [the heir of the defendant A] 3/7 shares in the Government - - - - 3 - - - - - - - - 7 shares in the Government - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [. [. [. - [. - [. - - - [. [