logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2020.05.26 2019고단1045
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a CR-V car.

Defendant 2019

8.7. Around 09:55, the driving of the said car led the two-lane road in front of the Dmaart C in the west-gun, Seoul, without any jurisdiction to proceed directly from the direction of the apartment to the direction of the F Elementary School.

Since it is a child protection zone, a driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to drive within 30 km speed limit to the driver of the motor vehicle, and to drive the motor vehicle with due care to the safety of children walking.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and operated the said car at a speed of 31km per hour within the children's protection zone, and caused the body of the victim G (six years of age) who crosses the road to the right side from the left side of the said car to the front side, due to the negligence that did not properly look at the front side while driving the said car at a speed of 31km per hour.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury, such as a ductal body felling, etc., accompanied by a ducts that require approximately seven weeks of treatment due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, an accident site photograph, and an actual condition survey report;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. A report on internal investigation (whether it falls under a children protection zone);

1. Investigation Report (Attachment of Babbbox images and CCTV images) - Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing video CDs;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (1) and Article 3 (1) and Article 3 (2) 11 of the Act on Special Cases concerning Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, and

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow