A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

On June 2, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Jeju District Court for the obstruction of performance of official duties, and was released from Jeju Prison as the revocation of detention on October 7, 2017, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 26, 2017, and completed the execution of the sentence.

At around 1:10 on January 9, 2020, the Defendant, at the Jeju-si, had a dispute over the b’s string of the victim C (the 81-year-old-old-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. Investigative reports, relevant photographs, investigative reports (F counterpart telephone conversations of the shote), investigative reports (to store videos in the process of hearing and listening to the statements of the victim), related video CDs, investigative reports (Attachment to the family relation certificate), and family relation certificates;

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, inquiry reports, investigation reports (reports on confirmation of the period of repeated crimes), inquiry into confinement, investigation reports (Attachment of criminal records related to repeated crimes of a suspect), application of statutes;

1. Articles 284 and 283 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The crime of this case for the reason of sentencing Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated offenders is a threat of the victims who are parents through LPG gas, which is a dangerous object. In light of the motive, method, and target of the crime, the crime is bad, and the defendant has been punished several times, including the suspended execution of imprisonment due to violent crimes, and on June 2, 2017, the Jeju District Court sentenced six months of imprisonment with prison labor for the obstruction of performance of official duties.