A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

2012 Highest order 1644

1. At around 03:00 on February 18, 2012, the Defendant assaulted the victim on the hand floor by taking a bath theory, such as “the victim victim D, who was an employee, was guilty of criminal records,” on the ground that the victim D did not drink, and his body or arms, or one stop.”

2. At the same time and place, the Defendant: (a) committed assault to female employees; (b) intending to take a large amount of desire for customers who did drinking alcohol; (c) 20 minutes of the disturbance; (d) thereby making customers go out of their main points; and (e) obstructed the business of a bar business in which businessism was legitimate by force.

2012 highestest 1740

3. Around 01:00 on December 23, 2012, the Defendant saw drinking to “C” main points of “C,” and the Defendant interfered with the victim’s business, such as: (a) the Defendant, at the same business establishment prior to locking, sold drinking alcohol; (b) the victim, who was the victim, was unable to sell drinking; and (c) the victim, who had a knife.e., having a knife., having a knife: (a) the knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each protocol of examination of the witness to D and E;

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to D and E;

1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting a crime: Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. From among concurrent crimes, the punishment is imposed as ordered by taking into account the following factors: (a) details and circumstances of the crime, the intent of the victims, the age of the defendants, character, conduct and environment, etc. of the reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Articles 38(1)2 and 50