beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is the E in the Geum-gu Busan Metropolitan Government D.
around 14:00 on May 2, 2013, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the fraud case against Defendant F in the above court Nos. 525 of the Seoul Central District Court at Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Court, Seocho-gu, Seoul, and took an oath.
1. The Defendant testified in the above court that “If G makes an investment of KRW 200 million in advance by phone calls to H, it would make H make an investment of KRW 700 million in addition to the dividend amount, and Defendant (F) would only have played a role in delivering money.”
However, the fact was known that G did not provide investment conditions to H.
Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.
2. The Defendant testified in the above court that “G refers to “e.g., to the witness who made an investment of KRW 200 million as a prior interest to H, the Defendant testified that he would give an additional amount of KRW 700 million in dividend if he/she invested KRW 200 million as a prior interest.”
However, there was no such a statement from G. However, there was no fact.
Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.
3. In the above court, the Defendant testified that “In addition, if the witness invests 200 million won of the principal, G written the phrase that he would additionally pay dividends of KRW 700 million to H. The Defendant testified as “e.g., that there is no fact that I would have heard.”
However, there was no such a statement from I.
Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.
4. The Defendant has completed the examination conducted by the defense counsel at the above court and invested 200 million won to the witness who is seated outside of the protocol of G.