logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2014.12.04 2014고단610
수산자원관리법위반
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for eight months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

Defendant

B does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is operating a Goman cafeteria with the trade name of E in Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Sinpo-si.

No person shall possess or process any species captured (hereinafter referred to as "illegal capture") without obtaining approval from the Minister of Oceans and Fisheries.

1. On March 19, 2014, Defendant A accepted the defect that Defendant A’s sole criminal attempt to sell illegal mincing and mincing the Defendant’s mobile phone by mincing the mincing C and G’s owner H, which is an illegal fishing vessel in the above restaurant.

On March 20, 2014, the Defendant, at around 03:00 on March 20, 2014, received the direction of H prior to the K Center in the trade name in the Sindong-ri, Ansan-si, and agreed to purchase at least 15 million won, a minck-ro 1 ma (93 Mau) which was illegally captured and partly dismantled on a cargo vehicle.

In this respect, the Defendant possessed one set of illegal capture.

2. After receiving the Defendants’ co-principal’s mincing 1 miles as set forth in paragraph (1), the Defendants immediately moved to a mincing warehouse used by him as a mincing workplace, and revealed the fact that the said mincing minc was illegally captured by Defendant B, who was waiting for contact in advance, and requested Defendant B to assist in further dismantling, handout, packing, etc., and the Defendant B consented thereto.

From the same day to 07:40 on the same day, the Defendants took 61 wooden boxes and six plastic boxes prepared for the use of knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, etc., with which they were unable to know the illegal capture of mintain at the same place.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to process one set of illegal captures.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police interrogation protocol against J and K:

1. Copies of each police interrogation protocol of L, M, N,O, and H;

1. On-site photographs of one-site photographs of the result of analysis of the performance of water services and dance;

1. The police;

arrow