logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.07.24 2013고단8048
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From around 1998, the Defendant was aware of the victim D (V, 39 years of age) and was living together with C, from around 200, the Defendant was in an internal relationship with the Defendant with the purport that “I will grow friendly to the victim,” and “I will live ties by divorce.”

1. On July 6, 2011, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “Igregnish travel to Jeju-do” to the victim in the victim’s residence located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Etel 231, “Igregnish traveled to Jeju-do, other punishments wered to cover KRW 10 million. Igrehn South Korea, and you do not go back, and the money will be KRW 800,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any property and income, and did not have any intention or ability to pay the above money even after receiving it from the victim, because he had attempted to use the above money as a gold from the Gangseoland.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received from the victim the delivery of KRW 10 million from the victim.

In addition, the Defendant, from July 6, 201 to April 18, 2012, obtained a total of KRW 33,450,000 from the victim on nine occasions, as shown in the crime inundation table.

2. Injury;

A. On December 22, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 22:00, on the ground that the victim did not lend money at the victim’s residence, as described in paragraph (1), and (b) took away the victim’s left hand to prevent the Defendant’s assault; and (c) took part in the fourth balance of the left-hand side where the victim’s number of days of treatment cannot be identified.

B. On October 31, 2013, at around 04:00 on October 31, 2013, the Defendant took a bath to the Defendant, on the ground that the Defendant had made a workplace and telephone conversations with the victim at the victim’s residence, such as the statement of Paragraph 1, “I am sick, I am dead once today,” and the Defendant took a look at the victim’s left eye due to drinking.

arrow