Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On August 23, 2016, the Defendant appeared in the court of Busan District Court 453, which was located in 129, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Incheon, the 2016 High Court 453, which was 129, as a witness, and tried as a witness.

Defendant B, along with the above Defendant B, testified as “for example” to the Prosecutor’s question, “I would like to have done so at that time,” and “I would like to unsatisfy even after each other’s humiliations, and sound has been great,” to question “I would like to unsatisf at that time.”

He testified, “At all thereafter, I see that “If you go to the head and stud at the toilet and stud at again, I would like to go to the head,” and “I would like to go to the rest before fighting is completed.”

testimony, “B self-employed” testimony, “A” testimony as “for example,” and the counsel’s “B fails to see the Defendant C.”

The prosecutor's office does not well memory the fact base.

B was under the influence of alcohol at the time, but B was the same as B when the author and C drink each other.

The reason why this talked is what is? The question “ at that time I did not write an celebling, dispute, spawn and spawn with three hundred millions.”

There is no memory to do so in the prosecutor's investigation.

The first time of police investigation does not do so even at the time of such investigation, and the first time of the prosecutor's investigation is the same as B when the investigation is conducted.

I have no memory referred to as “I”.

“The testimony was made.”

However, the facts were not known as to whether the defendant was the above B, and it was not deemed that the above B was self, and the prosecutor's investigation was the same as "B when the author and C make drinking mutually between the author and C."

“The statement was made as above.”