logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.01.14 2014고단6310
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a F-dond motor vehicle.

On April 27, 2014, the Defendant driven the above car at around 05:10, and proceeded one lane of the four-lanes in front of Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G at about 68 km in Si/Gun/Gu, from the sular road to the sular road.

At the time, it was difficult for a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle to thoroughly control the motor vehicle at all times, and there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the steering direction and brake system of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and led the victim H(62 years of age, women) crossing the road from the right side of the proceeding direction to the left side by the negligence of the Defendant’s neglecting it, to the front part of the vehicle’s right side.

As a result, the Defendant caused the victim's death by negligence in the above occupational negligence at around 13:00 on the same day by a low blood shock shock from the damage to the dives of the dives of the dives of the Glives University Sexual Hospital.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. A comprehensive traffic accident analysis and appraisal report;

1. Blue boxes and video CDs installed on the Defendant’s vehicle;

1. The Defendant asserts that there was no fault of the Defendant in the occurrence of the instant accident on the ground that the Defendant could not have discovered the victim immediately before the collision by crossing the victim without permission at a four-lane distance from the new wall time that the victim left.

The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence as above, namely, the defendant is proceeding in one lane among the four-lane roads, and the victim crosses the road from the right side of the front direction to the left side of the defendant's driving direction. As such, the defendant seems to have been able to recognize the victim who crosses the road from four lanes to one lane, and the victim crosses the road.

arrow