(영문) 의정부지방법원고양지원 2014.11.28 2014가합5579

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 의정부지방법원고양지원 2014.11.28 2014가합5579

분양대금 등

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 164,604,00 for the Plaintiff and its related KRW 164,60,000 per annum from June 28, 2014 to July 26, 2014, and the Defendant’s KRW 10.26% per annum.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The plaintiff is the redevelopment cooperative established on June 30, 2003 under the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents, and the defendant is a person who purchased the apartment C apartment C, 209 Dong 1303 (hereinafter "the apartment of this case") that was implemented and constructed by the plaintiff.

B. The main contents of the instant apartment sales contract concluded on February 3, 2012 between the Plaintiff and the Defendant are as follows.

Article 2(1) of the Civil Act provides that the aggregate of the total supply amount of value-added tax on the building price of a building site and the total supply amount of value-added tax (won) shall be 379,692,00; 253,385,455, 255, 338, 545, 658, 416,000 of the purchase price and the outstanding payment amount shall be 25,000,000 on June 27, 2014 when the contract for the remaining payment date of contract for the payment of the purchase price and the outstanding payment amount of the purchase price and the outstanding payment amount shall be 25,00,812,600,000, 164,604,000 of the purchase price and the outstanding payment amount shall be 253,385,45,338,545, 658,416,000.

When the bank in arrears fails to pay the monthly average credit interest rate (applicable delay rate) less than one month, but less than one month to three months, 5.26%, 5.26%, 9%, 10.26%, 13.26%, 15.26%, 15.26%, when the arrears exceeds six months to six months.

C. The Defendant failed to pay the remainder to the Plaintiff upon the lapse of June 27, 2014, which was the remainder payment date.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 3 (including branch numbers for those with a satisfy number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. According to the above findings of determination as to the cause of the claim, the fact of recognition is as follows.

참조조문

-도시 및 주거환경정비법

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2019.08.30 2018나83675

-광주지방법원 2019.10.24 2019가합50057

-서울중앙지방법원 2021.04.30 2020나46051

-서울북부지방법원 2013.01.30 2011가합5985

-서울고등법원 2016.06.24 2015나2044364