Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a year and six months, and a fine of 4,000,000 won.

The defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

"2012 Highest 1417"

1. On September 10, 2010, the Defendant was issued one of the above haul vehicles from D with the knowledge that D would not have the ability to maintain a halog car at a coffee shop in which it is impossible to know the trade name front of the Daegu apartment, Seogu, Daegu apartment, and that D would not be capable of maintaining a halog car from the Hyundai Capital Capital Capital of the injured party, and received one of the above halog vehicles from D.

The Defendant, while getting on and going through a halog car as above, was in custody of the victim. On March 16, 2011, the Defendant arbitrarily received 12 million won from F with the 51.9 million won of the market price at the Daegu-gu apartment apartment parking lot at D, Daegu-gu, Seoul-gu, Seoul-gu, on March 16, 201.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the victim's property in collusion with D.

2. Fraud;

A. On September 10, 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim D at a coffee shop stating that “Around the present mobile phone-related business, the Defendant borrowed KRW 5 million from the victim to the mobile phone-related business.” On the other hand, the Defendant would give a full payment of monthly rent for the vehicle while driving the leased vehicle under the name of the party, while driving the vehicle.”

However, even if the Defendant borrowed money from the victim, he did not have the intent or ability to repay it.

As such, the Defendant received delivery of KRW 5,200,000 in total over three times, on September 13, 2010, by deceiving the victim as such and receiving KRW 1,500,000 on September 15, 2010, and KRW 600,000 on October 4, 2010 from the victim under the pretext of borrowing money.

B. On March 29, 2011, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim before the victim D’s house located in Daegu Jung-gu, Daegu-gu, stating that “The Defendant left smartphones as security at the end of 2-3 days after the opening of the smartphones. The Defendant would recover the vehicle left as security and then terminate smartphones after 2-3 days.”