1. The defendant, on October 1995, has a jurisdiction over the 413m2 in order to the plaintiff as to the 413m3m2 prior to the Sinju District Court of Jungyang-gu.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. At the time of the Japanese occupation, such as the entry of the Land Survey Board, the Land Survey Board (Ordinance No. 2, repealed, 13 August 13, 1912) written by the Chosun-gun General Government Ordinance on the Land Survey Board with respect to “Paju-gun D” and “F large eight hundred and twenty hundred and twenty (818)” in the column of the date of report or notification as to “two (2) years (12) years (1913),” and “G” in the column of the owner’s name or title, and the address column is public column.

After that, “Paju-Gun D” was changed to the administrative district of “Paju-si,” and the “E preceding 125 square meters” was changed to the administrative district of “Paju-si,” and a part of “F large 818 square meters” was divided and land category changed to that of “Paju-si,” and the “F large 818 square meters” was changed to the area of 1,592 square meters prior to C in Paju-si, and the total land Nos. 1 and 2 was referred to as the “instant land.”

B. As to the land No. 1, the registration of ownership preservation was completed on October 13, 1995 with respect to the land No. 30700 which was received on October 13, 1995, and as to the land No. 2, the registration of ownership preservation was completed on April 19, 1996 with the same registry office No. 13897.

C. 18 years (1943) in the case of G with a permanent domicile and address in the Gyeonggi-do Pakistan-gun F related to the inheritance of the Plaintiff Selective Forces I

7.3. Death on October 12, 1970, the J, as the head of the family, succeeded to the property of the IC independently. On October 12, 1970, the J also succeeded to the property of the J jointly by K, L, M, etc., and on November 3, 1993, the Plaintiff and N jointly succeeded to the property of the K.

(i) The plaintiff is one of the co-inheritorss of the above I). [i.e., one of the above I's co-inheritors] The fact that there is no dispute, each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6 (including a number with a serial number; hereinafter the same shall apply), and the purport

2. As recognized above, G entered in the land survey book as the owner and I, the Plaintiff’s fleet, are identical to the Chinese name. The Plaintiff’s prior domicile and address are consistent with G’s address entered in the land survey book.