logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2018.02.01 2017고정852
강제추행
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around September 13:10 on September 2, 2017, the Defendant had weak ability to discern things or make decisions due to the editorial disorder disorder. On September 2, 2017, the Defendant: (a) reported that he was waiting for the elevator before the elevator in the Busan Kimhae-si D history of the Kimhae-si, Busan, and was waiting for the elevator; and (b) followed the Defendant: (c) made the victim’s her k's k's k's k's k's k's k's k's k'ss k's k's k'

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. 112 Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the table of reported case settlement;

1. Article 298 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 298 of the Selection of Punishment Act;

1. Article 10 (2) and Article 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act to mitigate mental and physical weakness;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

1. Determination as to the assertion of mental or physical disorder under the proviso of Article 16(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Exempted from Order to complete program (the principle prohibiting disadvantageous changes is applied to the case claiming formal trial only by Defendant

1. The summary of the argument is that the Defendant committed the instant crime under the condition of mental or physical loss or at least mental and physical weakness at the time of committing the instant crime due to the division of editing mental disorder.

2. According to the medical certificate, etc. against the defendant, the defendant issued a summons and a network from around June 2009 due to editing mental fission, and the medical doctor in charge diagnosed the defendant to the effect that he had been given a mental treatment from around June 2009, and that he was also diagnosed to the effect that the defendant had a mental fissiona, and that he was moving to his behavior without disregarding the request that he was instructed in the state where the exchange and the network continue, etc., and the defendant stated to the effect that "the defendant heard and acted in accordance with the request that he was called her her 's her her her sent' in this court, and after being arrested as a flagrant offender, he/she had a permanent existence in the district.

from head.

arrow