logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2016.08.25 2016고단356 (1)
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반등
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is as follows: (a) the Defendant received a request from A, an owner of the game industry, to seek the president from the head of the game industry in the gold market located in the Gu-U.S. Pyeong-dong on December 5, 2015; and (b) contacted B, who was on board, to contact B, and “the need to pay money”

“B” means “B” and “B” with “B” on the same day.

Bana, the chief executive officer of the Republic of Korea, the police officer of the Republic of Korea, with only one investigation, and Ra, if so, 3 million won first;

Along with the investigation, 1.5 million won is added to Alpha, Alpha, alpha

“In doing so, B made the police officer make a false statement to the effect that he was unemployed, thereby aiding and abetting the police officer’s criminal act.

Judgment

The “act of having an offender escape” under Article 151 of the Criminal Act is any act other than concealment which makes it difficult or impossible to act as a criminal justice such as investigation, trial, execution of sentence, etc. with respect to an offender, and there is no restriction on the means and method of such act. In addition, the crime of having an offender escape as a dangerous offender does not have to actually interfere with the function of criminal justice. However, at least, it is reasonable to interpret that the act of having an investigative agency make it difficult to detect and arrest the offender difficult, namely, the act of having the offender escape directly or directly facilitate the escape or escape of the offender.

In addition, in investigating a criminal case, the investigation agency originally has the authority and duty to determine the suspect regardless of the statement of the suspect or reference witness, and to collect and investigate objective evidence to acknowledge the suspected fact. As such, a reference witness who is under investigation by the investigation agency was aware of the fact that he/she knew or made a false statement while being investigated by the investigation agency.

Even if it is actively conducted by investigative agencies, it is erroneous.

arrow