Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, for two years from the date of the conclusion of this judgment against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A, who had no goods to be used at the early satisfaction session, resolved that Defendant B would have stolen containers owned by the D Boxes of the Victims' Police Station, which had been seen at the time of the seizure to Defendant B, and used them as the goods of the early assembly.

1. Defendant B, on January 21, 2013, carried a dump truck in Defendant A’s dump truck with a container stuff (3m aro 3m, vertical 3m) equivalent to KRW 1 million at the market price owned by the victim at the cump, which was located adjacent to the cump wall, around 21:00 in the middle of Pakistan, and Defendant B carried a dump truck with a container stuff as above.

Accordingly, the Defendants committed a theft of the property owned by the victim jointly.

2. On February 8, 2014, around 20:15, Defendant A carried a dump truck with a dump truck in Defendant B’s dump truck with the market price of KRW 2,00,000,000, which was owned by the victim by using a dump gun (3m, e.g., 3m, e., e., dump truck). Defendant B carried the dump truck with a container stuff.

Accordingly, the Defendants committed a theft of the property owned by the victim jointly.

3. On February 8, 2014, at the time of Pakistan on February 20:35, 2014, Defendant A carried the dump truck with a container stuff (a 3m, vertical 3m) equivalent to KRW 1 million at the market price owned by the victim at the dump truck (a 3m, vertical 3m). Defendant B carried the dump truck with a container stuff. As such, Defendant B carried the dump truck.

Accordingly, the Defendants committed a theft of the property owned by the victim jointly.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. E statements;

1. Statement of seizure of each police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to reports on theft occurrence and investigation reports (explosion of the seat of a suspected vehicle);

1. Article 331(2) and (1) of the Criminal Act

1. Concurrent Crimes - Defendants: the former part of Article 37 and Article 38 of the Criminal Act.