A person shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not less than six months and by imprisonment for not more than two months for the crimes of No. 6 and No. 7 as stated in the judgment of the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

On April 21, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten-month imprisonment with prison labor at the Seoul Central District Court for fraud, and the judgment was finalized on April 29, 201, and on May 3, 2012, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced the suspended sentence of two-year imprisonment with prison labor for fraud at the Seoul Central District Court for ten-month period, and the judgment became final and conclusive on May 11, 2012.

1. On June 24, 2010, the Defendant, at a coffee shop located in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, may engage in mediation for the victim C, as the victim “as he/she gets with an outer dyke, while he/she is making an external dyke, the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 200 million.”

10 million won may be asked for a difference to a person on his/her face.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the defendant was thought to use the vehicle for other purposes, such as living expenses, by receiving the purchase price from the injured party, and even if he received the money from the injured party, he did not have the intent or ability to use the vehicle as the purchase price for the victim.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and he received 10 million won from the victim as the purchase price of the vehicle on the same day.

2. On October 15, 2010, the Defendant walked a telephone to the victim C at an insular place and lent KRW 5 billion as it is necessary to rent the vehicle in the present place to another place. The Defendant received KRW 3 billion from D. If he/she receives money, he/she promises to anyone or promise to pay the money.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, in fact, the defendant was thought to use part of the money from the victim for other purposes, such as living expenses, and even if he borrowed money from the victim, he did not have the intent or ability to pay the money to the victim after using it as parking expenses.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and receives 5 million won from the victim as the parking expense for the same day.