logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.11.09 2018고정1232
폭행
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2017. 12. 24. 19:03 경 인천 남구 C 빌라 가동 1 층 복도에서 이웃 주민인 피해자 D( 남, 39세 )에게 “ 뭘 쳐다보냐

In the course of a dispute with “ash,” the victim was assaulted by the victim by having his/her cigarette string in his/her right bucks, which was cited by his/her hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D and E;

1. Partial statement of the witness F;

1. A written statement of D (the defendant and defense counsel asserted that the defendant did not have dancing while having a cigarette to the victim's view.

F, who is the defendant, was present as a witness in this court and "the defendant was laid on the floor after the string of the string at the time, and the victim was faced with face and threatened the defendant with the hing of the hing.

The defendant makes a statement that "the defendant did not have a cigarette to the face of the victim".

However, in full view of the following circumstances that can be recognized by the above evidence, F’s above legal statement is difficult to believe as it is, and it can be sufficiently recognized that the Defendant committed an assault by means of having a cigarette spacker in the victim’s sprink.

① The victim stated in the investigative agency that “the Defendant had a boat to the face of the victim” and stated in this court that “the Defendant had a boat to the see of the victim that he had a boat to the see of the victim.”

② E, a police officer called to the scene at the time of the first witness, was in dispute between the defendant and the victim at the time of the first witness.

The same body attached to each other (referring to the fighting match; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the police officer called the Defendant and the victim to stop and stop the Defendant and the victim. The Defendant stated to the effect that “the Defendant had contacted the victim’s face in the process of threatening the victim as the spacker by the police officer,” and that “the spacks the victim’s face is consistent with the victim’s statement.”

(3) E.

arrow