logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안양지원 2014.12.11 2014가합2780
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 25,00,000 to the Plaintiff A; (b) KRW 10,000,000 to the Defendant B; and (c) KRW 12,50,000 to the Defendant C and each of the said money.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On November 4, 2013, D (E) after approximately a week from the date of purchase of the instant electrical wholesale sheet for two persons manufactured and sold by the Defendant (hereinafter “the instant electrical wholesale sheet”), D (E) the temperature control period of the instant electrical wholesale sheet was broken down, and D (E) was exchanged by the Defendant with the said temperature control system.

B.

D due to health aggravation, most of the hours from around September 2013, the apartment house 202 on the ground of the Manan-gu, Mayang-gu, Mayang-gu, the residence of which was located, was located in the inside bank of the instant electrical box even on November 17, 2013, but a fire (hereinafter “the instant fire”) occurred on November 17, 2013.

C. D Around November 28, 2013, the instant fire caused a 20-29% of the physical surface to be treated at Annyang Hospital and Han National University Hospital. However, D’s death was caused by waste converging and satisculous shocks around November 28, 2013.

Plaintiff

A's spouse, plaintiffs B and C are children of D.

[Ground of recognition] The facts without any dispute, Gap evidence 1, 3, 4 evidence 1, 2, 5, and 9, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiffs asserted that the fire of this case occurred due to the manufacturing defect of the electric set of this case. Thus, the defendant asserts that the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiffs for the damages caused by the fire of this case.

As to this, the defendant asserts that the fire of this case is not a defect in the manufacturing of the electric set of this case, but a loss occurred due to the leakage of a type of light, etc. in an inner tent, and thus, the defendant is not liable to compensate

3. Determination

A. 1) In the fire site of this case, it is recognized that there was no inflammable substance or ignitation factor except the type light, etc. attached to the electric set of this case and an inner tent (hereinafter “instant type light, etc.”) at the fire site of this case. It is outside the fire site.

arrow