Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the above acquittal judgment is publicly announced.

1. Facts charged;

A. Defendant A is a chief fishing officer who exercises overall control over fishing operations of the fishing boat C at the port of the port of loading ship at Sacheon-si, Sacheon-si.

If the type of marine animals allowed to be captured and collected is determined and the growth permit is granted, the fishery business operator shall not catch any other type of marine animals, and the fishery products subject to capture are restricted to be destroyed by the fishing vessel permitted for the fishing for the fishing for the fishing for the fishing for the fishing for the fishing for the fishing for the fishing for the fishing for the fishing for the baseline.

피고인은 2018. 1. 4. 05:45부터 같은 날 07:25까지 통영시 욕지면 욕지도 남방 1.8 마일 해상에서 기선 권현망 C 선단으로 조업하면서 포획 가능한 수산물이 아닌 밴댕이( 디포 리) 약 78kg 을 포획하였다.

B. Defendant B is the owner of Defendant C’s vessel at the port port line.

A, who is an employee of the defendant, has committed the act as described in paragraph 1 with respect to the defendant's work.

2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone that the Defendants had the intent to commit the instant violation.

It cannot be readily concluded, and even if the Defendants were to have intentional intent, there is a possibility of expectation of lawful act.

It is difficult to see it.

가. 적발 경찰관은 건조 중인 약 700발 중 약 70발이 밴댕이인 것을 확인하였다( 피고인 A은 경찰 조사과정에서 이 사건 당일 723 발을 포획하였는데, 그 중 멸치가 684 박스, 밴댕이가 52 박스인 것을 확인하였다고

진술하였다). 즉 이 사건 당일 C 선단에서 포획한 멸치와 밴댕이 전체 양 중 밴댕이는 약 7 ~ 10%에 불과 하다. 나. 수산업 법상 기선 권현망 어업은 2척의 동력 어선으로 인망을 사용하여 멸치를 포획하는 어업으로, 피고인들은 수산업 법 시행령 등 관련 규정의 어구 어법에 맞는 자루 그물( 세목 망) 을 사용하여 멸치를 포획하였는데, 멸치를 포획하기 위한 세목 망에...