A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 12, 2015, the Defendant, using Kwikset Services, sent a passbook, check, and password to the new bank account (Account Number: C) in his name, which is a medium access to electronic financial transactions, with knowledge that he wanted to commit the singing of his name to the employees of Kwikset.

On May 14, 2015, at around 11:30 on May 14, 2015, the number of personnel engaging in licensing operations was used for the crime after opening an account in the name of D.

First of all, it is necessary to investigate the details of the deposit and withdrawal of the account and transfer the deposits of other banks to the new bank account (E) of the public prosecutor's office site that opened a new account and confirmed the name of the case, and obtained DNA financial transaction information by entering the password, account number, total account number, and total account number for the establishment of the security. On the same day, it was connected to the Internet banking site of the bank that used the computer in the victim new bank account of the victim at around 15:00 on the same day, and then, it was transferred KRW 50 million from the acquired bank account (Account Number:F) to the above new bank account of the defendant at the bank account of D using the password and total account number, and the defendant withdrawn it from the new bank located in the old credit system during the same day, and then the name scambling employee.

Accordingly, the Defendant, by allowing the data processing staff to enter information without authority into a computer or any other information processing device, made it easier to obtain financial benefits equivalent to KRW 50 million.

Summary of Evidence

1. Some of the Defendant’s legal statement (the Defendant denied the criminal intent to the effect that he had known that he had known about the singishing. However, in the past, the Defendant had been investigating the case in which his account was used for the singishing crime, and at the time of the instant case, the account of the above criminal facts.