logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.04.20 2016고단5458
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle B with detached motor vehicles.

On August 23, 2016, the Defendant driven the said car without obtaining a driver's license on August 15, 2016, and the offset cultural information in Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, 243 - 57 is also driving at a speed that makes it impossible to identify the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the road in front of the Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

Since there is a crosswalk where a signal, etc. is installed, it was confirmed whether a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely drive according to the new subparagraph after checking whether he/she is a person to reduce the speed and to see well the right and the right of the road.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence that the vehicle driving signal is changed to the stop signal, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded as it is, the Defendant received the left turn from the front part of the driving seat of the DNA driver car driving by the victim C (W, 31 years old) who was driving at the right turn one lane from the side of the main road on the same side of the main road.

With this shock, the driver's license of the F SPP car, which was driven by the victim E (the 56-year old) who was driven by the victim E (the 56-year old) while the above NPP car was pushed into two laness, conflict with the above PPP car's side by the chief side of the PPP car.

Ultimately, the Defendant by such occupational negligence inflicted injury on the victim C, such as salt, tensions, etc. in light of the following conditions: (a) the victim G (31) suffered, respectively, injury to the brain-dead sugar, etc., for which no one exists in two weeks of open treatment required for approximately two weeks of treatment; (b) the victim H (47 years of age) suffered, by the victim E, approximately two weeks of treatment; and (c) the victim E suffered, respectively, injury such as dratum salt, tensions, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The actual survey report, traffic accident photograph, and each diagnosis report, respectively;

arrow