Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing car.

On November 1, 2011, 05:50, the Defendant driven the above car and made a left turn to the left from the front side of the day to the front side of the school.

Since the intersection has been controlled by traffic signals under the signals of the signal apparatus, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents to those engaged in driving of a motor vehicle by driving the motor vehicle according to the signals of the front line signal apparatus.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and received the front part of the DNA taxi vehicle operated by the injured party C (the aged 48) who was straight from the opposite lane at the time when the left turn was due to negligence while the electric signal was changed to red, and received the front part of the said vehicle as the front part of the said vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as 12 weeks of medical treatment due to such occupational negligence, and scarcity pressure pressure, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C's statement on the occurrence of traffic accidents;

1. The actual condition of traffic accidents;

1. A photograph of the accident site vehicle;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the video Acts and subordinate statutes by cutting a black boom;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) and proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, the selection of imprisonment without prison labor;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (Considerations, etc. favorable to the defendant among the reasons for the suspension of execution);

1. The defendant's reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc. violates the signal and thus the illegality of the accident in this case is serious, the victim's injury is serious, but it is not agreed with the victim: Provided, That the defendant has no record of punishment exceeding the same criminal record and fine, a comprehensive insurance is subscribed, a confession of the crime in this case is made, and other defendant's age and age.