The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the lower court (two months of imprisonment) on the gist of the grounds of appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the Defendant’s judgment reflects the Defendant, the recovery of damage, and the fact that the equity should be considered in the case of the judgment at the same time with the previous conviction. However, such fact appears to have been taken into account in the original judgment. Although the Defendant had had been punished several times for the same kind of crime, it appears that the Defendant committed a crime during the period of repeated crimes despite the fact that the nature of the crime was poor, and other conditions of sentencing specified in the instant records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, conduct, environment, family relationship, motive, and circumstances after the crime, are too unreasonable.

3. According to the conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.