The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The penalty imposed by the lower court (one year of imprisonment and additional collection) shall be excessively unreasonable.

2. The circumstances are as follows: (a) the accused confessions and reflects the judgment; and (b) cooperates in the investigation of narcotics during the investigation process, etc.

However, the defendant has the ability to punish punishment for the same criminal offense several times, and this case has a criminal history of punishment for the defendant for the second offense only for six months after the execution of punishment for the same crime has been completed, and it is a criminal act during the repeated period, and in the case of arranging the trade of phiphonephones, there is a need to punish punishment in light of the fact that the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and various sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., are considered to be too unreasonable, and therefore, the defendant's assertion

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.