The defendant shall be innocent.

The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is as follows: (a) around 11:30 on October 30, 2012, at the Defendant’s office located in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the Defendant: (b) committed a dispute with the victim E (the age of 47) and his debt repayment; (c) took a dangerous object to the victim; and (d) took a dangerous object to the victim; and (e) took a dangerous object to the victim; and (e) brought the victim’s hand back to the victim; and (e) took a breath of the victim’s flap, which would result in the victim’s flap, which is a dangerous object that was adjacent to the singing counter, and caused the victim’s injury, such as fladrat, flads and tension, which requires the victim’s treatment for about three weeks.

In this regard, the defendant argued that he did not throw away the victim's chair or go beyond the limit, and that he did not go to go to the victim and only pushed the victim's breast part once.

On the other hand, there are statements made by E and investigative agencies to the effect that the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim E, such as the above facts charged, and the Kakao Stockholm photographs of conversations between the victim E and F, which are taken by the victim E and F.

However, the witness F, a third party witness, testified to the effect that the defendant was willing, but did not have any doubt, but did not excessive in the office, and that the defendant did not go to the defendant's office in order to avoid violence from the victim's office, unlike the victim's testimony that F was first entered the defendant's office, and later he testified that the victim was suffering from brut disease and has been suffering from water, it is difficult to understand that the defendant's assault had the victim frut in order to obtain water from the victim's escape.