logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2019.12.04 2019나34976
청구이의
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The plaintiff and the grounds for appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and they did not submit new evidence to this court. The fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justified even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance is proven.

This Court's reasoning is as follows, inasmuch as the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance is the same as that of the corresponding column of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, the reasoning for this Court's explanation is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the same Act.

2. The addition to the judgment of the court of first instance shall add the following to not more than 17 pages 4 of the judgment:

“On the other hand, the Plaintiff: (a) leased the instant real estate in KRW 8.5 million from the original lessor D to the Defendant in monthly rent of KRW 7.7 million; (b) the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff a sum of KRW 1.5 million, which is the difference between the rent of the said month for 20 months (i.e., KRW 150,000 x 20 months); and (c) the Defendant is obligated to compensate for the difference between the office house and fixtures used by the Plaintiff while leaving the instant real estate without permission; and (d) the said money should be deducted from the lease deposit. However, the Plaintiff leased from the original lessor D in Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, and the second floor left-hand 2 column, including the instant real estate, to the Defendant in monthly rent of KRW 70,00,000,000,000 for KRW 70,000,000,0000,000,000,000.

arrow