logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2015.11.19 2015고단1390
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On June 4, 1993, around 05:19 on June 4, 1993, the employee A employed by the Defendant 93 high-level3557 violated the restriction on vehicle operation by operating the B truck belonging to the Defendant in excess of the total weight.

B. At around 03:10 on December 23, 1993, the Defendant’s employees C violated the restriction on the operation of the vehicle by operating the D freight vehicle belonging to the Defendant in excess of the total weight in the granchisium of the Changwon-gun, Changwon-gun, the Changwon-gun, the Changwon-gun, the Gyeongwon-gun, and the Defendant’s employees.

2. Of Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545, Mar. 10, 1993; Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995) which applies to each summary order subject to review, the part concerning a violation under Article 84 subparagraph 1 of the same Act has become retroactively effective due to the Constitutional Court’s decision of unconstitutionality 201Hun-Ga24, Dec. 29, 201, and thus, the Defendant is acquitted pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow