logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2013.08.28 2013고정273
사문서위조등
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the facts charged are not guilty.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Forgery of private documents and uttering of private documents dated January 3, 2012;

A. On January 3, 2012, the Defendant: (a) had a person whose name is unknown at a place unknown to him/her on or around January 3, 2012, enter “C”, “D”, “E”, “F”, “G” in the mobile phone column, “Korea Bank H in the payment account change column; and (b) had the representative of a chain store enter “I and one other”, “I and one other”, “I and one other”, and “A” in the proxy form, and “I and one other” and “A” in the joint representative column, which the Defendant kept in custody of the Defendant.

In addition, the Defendant had a person whose name is unknown enter the “J”, “E”, “E”, “H”, “H”, “I”, “I”, and “I” and “A” respectively in the name of the franchise store in the “Agreement on Use of Credit Card Account” held by the Defendant, and had the Defendant affix his/her seal and seal on the Defendant’s custody.

For the purpose of exercising rights, the Defendant, without authority, forged the “Report on Non-Cock Card Chain Store” under the name of the Defendant, a private document on the duty of rights, and a “Written Consent to Use of Credit Card Merchant Account” respectively.

B. On the same day as the above paragraph (a), the Defendant had a person who is unable to know the name at the source point of the SC Card in the inciting the right in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, who is not aware of the forgery, deliver the forged “SC Card Merchant’s Report” and the “Agreement on Use of FC Card Account” to an employee who is unable to know the name of the place of the use of the forged name as if they were duly formed.

2. Forgery of private documents dated January 16, 2012, and

arrow