1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On May 30, 2006, A driven a freight B vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) around 21:45, and passed through the said intersection in violation of the signal while driving on the two-lane road near the three-lane intersection in front of the stations located in Yongnam-gun C (hereinafter “the instant accident point”) at the direction of the vehicle located in the city of Yongnam-gun, the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lane road in the direction of the station in the river. At the same time, at the one-lane opposite to the direction of the Plaintiff’s driving in the above intersection, the two-lanes of the E driver’s vehicle (hereinafter “victim’s vehicle”) passing along the central line and passing it to the left through the opposite intersection, leading to the collision between the Plaintiff’s two-lane and the Plaintiff’s intersection, and the point of collision between the two-lanes of the vehicle and the Plaintiff’s intersection.

E suffered from injury, such as damage to the number of lower-ranking brain, and injury such as the chief executive officer of the Yang-Ba.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). B.

In the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, a joint team comprised of the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, the Korea Transportation Safety Authority, the Young Gun Office, the Young Gun Police Station, and outside experts shall be organized in the same year.

4.8. Departments

4. On October 3, 196, the part concerning the problems and proposals of the accident point of this case in the report (No. 4, hereinafter referred to as the "the report of this case") is as follows as a result of surveying the areas vulnerable to the safety of Yong-Gun in Jeonnam-do for the three days.

C. The Plaintiff is an insurer who entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with respect to the Plaintiff’s vehicle, and paid KRW 1,159,914,470 in total with compensation and insurance proceeds for damages arising from the instant accident until January 13, 2016.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 5 (including branch numbers in case of additional number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Judgment on the plaintiff's assertion

A. The road where the Plaintiff alleged the instant accident occurred.