Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a EXE car.

On March 25, 2019, the Defendant driven the said car at around 20:13, and driven the two-lanes in front C in front of the Jeju city along the two-lanes from the intersection of water intersection, and did not discover a warning flag driven by the victim D (year 87) prior to the same lane due to occupational negligence, while driving the two-lanes from the intersection of water intersection at the intersection of the water intersection, and caused the victim to use the front part of the said car as a road.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the above victim by occupational negligence, such as the fladation of flador, etc., and caused the death of the above victim by mass blood transfusion and multiple growth donation during treatment at the F Hospital located in Jeju-si E at around 14:53 of the following day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement related to G and H;

1. A traffic accident analysis and appraisal report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of death certificate (D);

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and selection of

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. 수강명령 형법 제62조의2 양형의 이유 피해자가 사망하는 중대한 결과가 발생한 점, 한편 당시에 가로등이 없는 깜깜한 도로였던 점, 피고인이 반성하며 피해자 유족과 원만히 합의한 점, 그 밖에 피고인의 나이, 성행, 가족관계, 환경, 범행의 경위 및 결과, 범행 후의 정황 등 이 사건 변론에 나타난 여러 사정들을 종합적으로 고려하여 주문과 같이 형을 정한다.