beta
Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. On February 25, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 11:05 on February 25, 2016, the Defendant: (b) committed an indecent act by force against the victim E (a person, a woman, 16 years of age) who was a guest of the TV set up in the Daegu-gun District of the Magu, and the victim E (a person, a woman, a woman, a woman aged 16 years of age) and friendly talks with friendly F.
2. The Defendant asserts that, although he was flaged by hand, etc. to the effect that he was flaging by, on the date, time and place indicated in the facts charged in the instant case, he did not have the fact that he was flaging with the intention to commit an indecent act.
3. Determination
A. In full view of the evidence of this case, including witness F’s testimony, statement of stenographic records on the victim’s statement, CCTV images, etc., it is recognized that the Defendant is friendly to the victim’s left body part of the victim’s body by extending out the hands outside the date and place indicated in the above facts charged, and further, it is examined whether the Defendant had the intent to commit an indecent act and contacted the victim’s body.
B. According to each evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the defendant was a lawyer working in the Western branch branch of the Daegu District Court on the day of this case for the victim and his friendship F who did not have any awareness at the above Drup of the day of this case, and was a lawyer working in the Seogu District Court on his own as the head of the household, and had been approaching him. The defendant and the victim talked at the above soup and talked at the soup branch of the court on the fact that the TV of the above soup branch of the soup branch of the court was set up at the soup branch of the above, and the defendant moved to the upper part of the soup branch of the soup branch of the court, and the defendant was standing near the victim, etc. who was sitting at the soup branch of the above, and thus, the defendant was recognized as having a part of the victim's body, etc. as they were living together with the frup, despite being able to have a victim by weather or frup, at the time.