Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant who interfered with his/her business, from October 22, 2017 to October 18:30, 18:45, sent KRW 1,400 to a DNA bus operated by the victim C while under the influence of alcohol at a difficult cancer terminal located in the 44-ro of the difficulty in Gwangju-si in Gwangju-si, Gyeonggi-do, and paying a charge for driving by the victim C.

While requesting a return, the victim asked the bus company to demand the return of the rent, the defendant continued to demand the return of the money, but the defendant failed to start the bus due to the demand for the return of the money and the failure to start the bus by blocking the bus from being in front of the bus, so that many unspecified bus passengers are unable to start about 15 minutes of the bus, thereby hindering the operation of the bus by force.

2. Although the Defendant was requested several times to interfere with bus operation from the relevant slope F of the Gwangju Police Station E box, and G, he/she would receive a taxi fee from the bus company, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph (1) and at the place specified in paragraph (1).

At the same time, the bus was unfolded in the parking lot from time to time, and the above police officers knew that they would leave the patrol lane, but refused to do so, and led to the situation where the operation of other buses continued in the above parking lot would interfere with the operation of other buses. Therefore, the above police officers attempted to board the patrol vehicle due to the Defendant’s body behind the body of the Defendant, and the Defendant committed assault by the police officers, which caused the police officers to fall off the police uniform with the breath of the F, which had been spathed several times, while making the breath of the breath of the police.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the police officer's legitimate performance of duties on the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business) and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of official duties) of the same Act concerning criminal facts.