A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On November 17, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for 4 months as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (non-licenseless Driving) in the support for childbirth of Suwon Friwon, and the judgment was finalized on November 25, 2016, and is currently under probation.

On June 14, 2017, the Defendant stated “78-ro, 78-ro, fluencing, fluencing-ro, fluencing-ro, i.e., fluencing-ro, i.e., e., 78-ro, flucing-si.” However, such a road does not exist and appears to be a clerical error in the “78-ro, flucing-ro,” in light of the detection report (in the investigation record No. 4), and thus, it appears to have no effect on

Until now on the road, a car driver has been driving the Cknife vehicle without obtaining a driver's license from about 1 km.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The driver's license ledger;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes reporting the circumstances of driving without licenses;

1. The Defendant committed the instant crime under Article 152 Subparag. 1 and Article 43 of the Act on the Road Traffic, and Article 152 Subparag. 1 and Article 43 of the Act on the Selection of Punishment, and Article 152 of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, and Article 20 of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes concerning the Punishment, etc. concerning the Punishment, etc. of Illegal Crimes, on two occasions, the Defendant committed the instant crime, even though he was sentenced to a fine for a crime without a license, one time a suspended sentence of imprisonment, and

The Defendant vindicates that the instant crime was committed in order to contact with D’s cafeteria E, an employee at the restaurant, and to leave the hospital to the hospital.

However, even in accordance with each description of the F Council's medical certificate and opinion written by G, E, prior to the day of the instant crime, can only be recognized as a fact between the above hospital with the symptoms of June 15, 2017, following the instant crime, after receiving the outpatient treatment from the above hospital due to the aftermath, etc. of June 13, 2017, prior to the day of the instant crime.

Therefore, E has not received treatment from the above hospital on the day of the crime of this case.