logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2019.05.30 2019고단704
강제추행
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 6, 2018, at around 20:35, the Defendant committed an indecent act by force against the victim, such as the victim C (here, who reported outdoor performances in a state where the victim was her her son and her son with his her her son and her son together with his her son and her son with his her son, at around 20:35, 2018.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness C and D;

1. Each police statement of C or D;

1. Application of the respective laws and regulations of C and D

1. Article 298 of the Criminal Act and Article 298 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. 주장의 요지 피고인은 범죄사실 기재 일시 및 장소에서 피해자의 엉덩이를 움켜쥔 사실이 없다.

The victim and witness D found the defendant only five minutes after the indecent act was committed and identified as an indecent act. This is the victim and witness D.

2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

① After the victim who had shown a public performance, the Defendant went back to the direction of the defecter E without specific explanation by the victim and D.

② The Defendant asserted that D had her her her m, why her her her m, and her her m, and affixed a photograph by affixing his her her m, but the victim and D stated that the Defendant, from the investigative agency to the court, had her her m, went away while the Defendant stated that her her her m, “shall not be the only person,” and that there was no fact that she her sm or photographed her her sm.

(3)

arrow