The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty by misunderstanding of facts and misunderstanding of legal principles against the defendant's statement of a witness who is not reliable, although the defendant did not have the victim's chest, is erroneous in understanding of facts

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (2 million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the lower court’s argument of mistake of facts and misapprehension of legal principles are: (i) the victim has consistently stated in the investigative agency and the court of the lower court that “the victim saw the key to the defendant by using the victim’s jackets.” The witness F, who observed the case, also stated that “the victim saw the victim’s body in the process of making the victim satising an object and satisfing the victim’s chest. immediately after the above, the victim and F was satisfing the victim’s chest.” The witness G, who was present at the scene of the case but did not witness the crime, stated that “the victim satisf was satfing the victim’s sound,” and that “the victim satisfing the victim’s sound,” was consistent with the main part of the crime, and that the victim’s motive or reason was not found before and after the victim’s satisfing the victim’s appearance at satisf’s risk, and that the witness’s testimony or reason was not found.

Even if such circumstances alone, the credibility of the statements made between the victim and the witness.